PL EN
PRACA POGLĄDOWA
Oncological Aspects of the Eye Enucleation Procedure
 
Więcej
Ukryj
1
Department of Ophthalmology and Ocular Oncology, University Hospital in Krakow, Poland Head: Prof. Bożena Romanowska-Dixon, PhD (hab.), MD
 
2
Department of Ophthalmology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland Head: Prof. Bożena Romanowska-Dixon, PhD (hab.), MD
 
 
Data nadesłania: 14-06-2024
 
 
Data akceptacji: 26-07-2024
 
 
Data publikacji: 14-10-2024
 
 
Ophthalmology 2024;27(3):26-31
 
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
STRESZCZENIE
The removal of the eyeball is one of the earliest surgical procedures recorded in the history of medicine. The decision to perform enucleation is challenging for both the patient and the physician, and it is typically considered a last resort when all conservative treatment options have been exhausted. In recent years, the number of enucleation procedures performed for advanced glaucoma and intraocular tumors has significantly declined. This is largely due to advancements in laser technology, surgical techniques, and local treatments for glaucoma, as well as the widespread use of radiation therapy for intraocular tumors. Although enucleation can negatively impact the patient’s quality of life and psychological well-being, it remains the treatment of choice in cases of advanced intraocular tumors, extensive eye injuries that preclude the reconstruction of ocular structures, or painful blind eyes. Fortunately, advancements in orbital implants and modern ocular prostheses now offer patients the possibility of achieving a satisfactory cosmetic outcome.
REFERENCJE (21)
1.
Fu L, Patel BC: Enucleation. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island, FL, 2024 Jan.
 
2.
Wang KJ, Li SS, Wang HY: Psychological symptoms in anophthalmic patients wearing ocular prosthesis and related factors. Medicine. (Baltimore) 2020; 99: 29.
 
3.
Setlur V Parikh J, Roa N: Changing causes of enucleation over the past 60 years. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009; 248(4): 593– 597.
 
4.
Ancona-Lezama D, Dalvin LA, Shields CL: Modern treatment of retinoblastoma: A 2020 review. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov; 68(11): 2356– 2365.
 
5.
Shields JA, Shields CL: Management of posterior uveal melanoma: past, present, and future: the 2014 Charles L. Schepens lecture. Ophthalmology. 2015 Feb; 122(2): 414– 428.
 
6.
The Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) randomized trial of pre-enucleation radiation of large choroidal melanoma, II: initial mortality findings. COMS report No. 10. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998; 125: 779– 796.
 
7.
Rutkowski P, Romanowska-Dixon B, Markiewicz A, et al.: Diagnostic and therapeutic management of patients with ocular melanomas - recommendations of the Polish Society of Oncology. Nowotwory J Oncol. 2022; 72: 342– 352.
 
8.
Pham CM, Custer PL, Couch SM: Comparison of primary and secondary enucleation for uveal melanoma. Orbit. 2017 Dec; 36(6): 422– 427. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2017.1337183. Epub 2017 Aug 16. PMID: 28812919.
 
9.
Romanowska-Dixon B, Dębicka-Kumela M, Śmigielski J, et al.: Sex Differences in the Treatment of Uveal Melanoma in a Group of 1336 Patients. J Pers Med. 2023 Feb 17; 13(2): 353.
 
10.
Cieślik K, Rogowska A, Hautz W: Focal therapies for retinoblastoma. Klin Oczna. 2022; 124(3): 131– 136.
 
11.
Romanowska-Dixon B, Jager MJ, Coupland SE: Onkologia Okulistyczna. PZWL Wydawnictwo Lekarskie. Warszawa 2019; 285– 294.
 
12.
Habib LA, North VS, Freitag SK, et al.: Medical comorbidities and orbital implant exposure. Acta Ophthalmol. 2022 May; 100(3): e813– e819.
 
13.
Culler AM: Orbital implants after enucleation; basic principles of anatomy and physiology of the orbit and relation to implant surgery. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1952; 56: 17– 20.
 
14.
Rokohl AC, Kopecky A, Trester M, et al.: Post-enucleation socket syndrome - a novel pathophysiological definition. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug; 260(8): 2427– 2431.
 
15.
Tyers AG, Collin JR: Orbital implants and post enucleation socket syndrome. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK. 1982; 102(1): 90– 92.
 
16.
Mules PH: Evisceration of the globe with artificial vitreous. 1884-1895. Adv Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990; 8: 69– 72.
 
17.
Sami D, Young S, Petersen R: Perspective on orbital enucleation implants. Surv Ophthalmol. 2001; 52: 244– 265.
 
18.
Schmitzer S, Simionescu C, Alexandrescu C, et al.: The Anophthalmic Socket - Reconstruction Options. J Med Life. 2014; 7 Spec No. 4 (Spec Iss 4): 23– 29.
 
19.
Sathe S, Pisulkar S, Nimonkar SV, et al.: Positioning of iris in an ocular prosthesis: A systematic review. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020 Oct-Dec; 20(4): 345– 352.
 
20.
Phan LT, Hwang TN, McCulley TJ: Evisceration in the modern age. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jan; 19(1): 24– 33.
 
21.
Rath S, Honavar SG, Naik MN, et al.: Evisceration in unsuspected intraocular tumors. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010 Mar; 128(3): 372–379.
 
eISSN:1689-362X
ISSN:1505-2753
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top