PL EN
CASE REPORT
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Macular holes pose a significant threat to central vision, necessitating precise diagnosis and intervention with an occurrence of 1 per 1000 patients over the age of 55. This manuscript presents a case study of a 66-year-old man with a retinal detachment in the right eye and full-wall macular hole. The patient underwent a multi-step surgical intervention involving pars plana vitrectomy, internal limiting membrane peeling with silicone oil tamponade, retinal endophotocoagulation, and administration and removal of the perfluorocarbon liquid DK-line in the first step. The second stage of treatment comprised silicone oil removal via posterior access vitrectomy, injection of 25% SF6 into the right eye, and treatment of intraoperatively found macular hole with an inverted flap method. The case underscores the association between macular hole and rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, with potential iatrogenic causes during vitrectomy. The inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique emerged as a superior strategy for managing full-thickness macular holes, demonstrating high closure rates and improved visual acuity postoperatively. This case study contributes to the evolving understanding of macular hole pathogenesis and reinforces the significance of tailored surgical approaches for optimal patient outcomes.
REFERENCES (11)
1.
Macular Hole - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf. Accessed January 4, 2024. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/b....
 
2.
GASS JD: Reappraisal of biomicroscopic classification of stages of development of a macular hole. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 1995; 119(6): 752–759. doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(14)72781-3.
 
3.
Duker JS, Kaiser PK, Binder S, et al.: The International Vitreomacular Traction Study Group classification of vitreomacular adhesion, traction, and Macular Hole. Ophthalmology. 2013; 120(12): 2611–2619. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.07.042.
 
4.
Martins Melo I, Jhaveri A, Bansal A, et al.: Pathophysiology of secondary macular hole in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment. Investigative Opthalmology & Amp; Visual Science. 2023; 64(13): 12. doi:10.1167/iovs.64.13.12.
 
5.
Kim DY, Jo YJ, Kim J-Y, et al.: Surgical outcomes of vitrectomy for macular hole-induced retinal detachment according to various surgical methods: A multicenter retrospective study. Seminars in Ophthalmology. 2021; 36(8): 728–733. doi:10.1080/08820538.2021.1900288.
 
6.
Medina CA, Ortiz AG, Relhan N, et al.: Macular Hole After Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment. Retina. 2017 Jun; 37(6): 1065–1072. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001351. PMID: 27755378; PMCID: PMC5388588.
 
7.
Brouzas D, Dettoraki M, Lavaris A, et al.: Postoperative eccentric macular holes after vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling. International Ophthalmology. 2016; 37(3): 643–648. doi:10.1007/s10792-016-0320-6.
 
8.
Yuan J, Zhang L-L, Lu Y-J, et al.: Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling versus inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for macular hole-induced retinal detachment: A systematic review of literature and meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmology. 2017; 17(1). doi:10.1186/s12886-017-0619-8.
 
9.
Silva N, Ferreira A, Nawrocka (vel Michalewska) ZA, et al.: Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique: Is it the best option for macular holes? Clinical Ophthalmology. 2021; Vol. 15: 3295–3303. doi:10.2147/opth.s284614.
 
10.
Michalewska Z, Michalewski J, Adelman RA, et al.: Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for large macular holes. Ophthalmology. 2010; 117(10): 2018–2025. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.02.011.
 
11.
Yamashita T, Sakamoto T, Terasaki H, et al.: Best surgical technique and outcomes for large macular holes: Retrospective Multicentre Study in Japan. Acta Ophthalmologica. 2018; 96(8). doi:10.1111/aos.13795.
 
eISSN:1689-362X
ISSN:1505-2753
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top